That title is kind of deceptive - it's really what I want to write about. But I'm bushed, so I'll just write about what I'm going to write about. That way I'll continue my pledge to post every day for a month.
Anyway: the status of evidence is vexed enough in a courtroom or laboratory, places where the status and narrative placement of evidence is set according to fairly inflexible rules. What, then, can one prove in a work of literature, using evidence - i.e., quotation, fact, photograph, etc. I'm very interested in those places where evidence as intractable, obdurate thing resists the narrative - or points in a different direction.
Review of Io ed Eucalipto (Italian for I and Eucalyptus)
-
https://www.vocidallisola.it/2025/06/20/io-e-eucalipto-di-susan-m-schultz/
by Daniela Maurizi
In English, including "the bitch, Lilith"!
https://www.v...
2 days ago
